Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames

Subject: Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames
From: ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:51:23 -0500
Hi David,

This is QName-regex bliss.
(Within W3C constraints (e.g. 5th ed.).

Thank you David, Ken.

Cheers,
ac




On 03/02/2010 11:21, David Carlisle wrote:



'^(\i([\c-[:]])*:)?\i([\c-[:]])*$'

David




Although one should probably note that because of the W3C's rather cavalier attitude to maintaining standards, the question in the subject line is not well posed: The set of legal Qnames changed between XML 1.0 edition 4 and edition 5, so the meaning of \c which is defined by reference to the XML spec depends on which edition 1.0 of XML is being implemented

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread