Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL wish list - page column gap/separator line|
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:42:38 +0000
The XSL 2.0 requirements document is at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20-req/
I've noticed that in the recent announcement emails, and here, that it's "XSL 2.0" in the title, but then "XSL FO" everywhere else.. including the url. Even in the abstract is says "This is the requirements document for XSL-FO and not for XSLT", which would be obvious if was just called "XSL-FO" all the time....
Is there a reason why it can't be referred to as "XSL-FO" whenever you mean XSL-FO?
After the split, XSLT emerged, XSL-FO kept the XSL as the WG name etc.
I guess XSL is the WG, so it must remain, but XSLT and XSL-FO are the two recs in reality.
-- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk