Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT & XML DTD compliance From: B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:09:48 -0500 |
I don't see DTD's going away for a long time, just that few are writing new ones due to the enhancements available in more recent schema types.
I think that depends on what users you are working with. There are markets in which the enhancements available in RNG and XSD are of minimal value and the challenges of working with them are significant. For these people the combination of DTD and Schematron is meeting their needs very nicely. And yes, they are creating new DTDs and new Schematrons on a continuing basis.
====================================================================== B. Tommie Usdin mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301/315-9631 Suite 207 Direct Line: 301/315-9634 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT & XML DTD compliance, Dave Pawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] NCName, QName and colons, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] XSLT & XML DTD compliance, Dave Pawson | Date | [xsl] XML attribute value to patter, Selvaganesh |
Month |