Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:01:18 -0500 |
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:48 +0000, Florent Georges wrote: [...] > Thanks, Mike. But clearly, REST cannot be supported by doc(). > You can issue simple GET requests, but REST is based on more > HTTP verbs than GET. Not mentioning headers yet. Before XQuery and XSLT 2 were Recommendations I wrote a proposal to give access to the URI resolver that would allow e.g. SOAP. At that time it was rejected, at least partly because I didn't write it well enough probably. Since then, the XML Processing Model Working Group (XProc)'s pipelining language has some support for HTTP, and I think may offer a better answer. But yes, let's talk in Prague about it - it's actually one of the topics for my session too: should we (W3C) do more work *around* the current scope of XSLT and XQuery, e.g. fitting XProc and XSLT and Query together more tightly, or maybe enough of a Web framework that people can use these languages as back ends for Web apps directly. There seems to be quite a bit of interest in such things. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Florent Georges | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Michael Kay |
Month |