Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:44:43 +0000 (GMT) |
Liam R E Quin wrote: Hi, > Since then, the XML Processing Model Working Group (XProc)'s > pipelining language has some support for HTTP, and I think may > offer a better answer. Actually, I rewrote the design of the HTTP Client in the early days to match the design of p:http-request (the structure of the elements, the names of the elements and attributes, etc.) So at the end of the day, it provides the functionality of the standard XProc step back to all XPath-based languages. > But yes, let's talk in Prague about it - it's actually one of > the topics for my session too: should we (W3C) do more work > *around* the current scope of XSLT and XQuery, e.g. fitting > XProc and XSLT and Query together more tightly I think the main problem here is that XProc is not based on XDM. If it was not that far in the standardization process, I guess there would be enough voices to change that, but that's not an option anymore, sadly. I am sure that is going to cause some pain in the next few years... > or maybe enough of a Web framework that people can use these > languages as back ends for Web apps directly. There seems to > be quite a bit of interest in such things. That's one of the two main topics of my presentation. My new website http://h2oconsulting.be/ is based on an experimental implementation of the EXPath Webapp module (still in draft stage, that's a kind of servlet container) for instance. But shush, more in XML Prague ;-) Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Alex Clark |
Month |