Subject: Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2? From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:46:05 +0000 |
On Sat, Mar 06 2010 13:31:03 +0000, pgfearo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ... > The XSLT <xsl:message> provides a useful method for outputing test > results, especially when all xsl:message output from the test case set > is aggregated into a single XML file, as in CoherentWeb. A further The issue that I always have with all-XSLT testing frameworks is that they're good for the feel-good cases of testing that you get the right output for the right input, but not so good for testing that you get the right result for the wrong input if the right result is <xsl:message terminate="yes"/>. If the test framework is also XSLT, it's going to die when the stylesheet under test dies. I can't tell what CoherentWeb would do. I'm a committer for both Juxy and XSpec. XSpec is good, and my clients that are primarily XSLT users prefer it because it's just XSLT, but Juxy can cope with <xsl:message terminate="yes"> because, as a Java application with Java and XML syntaxes for tests, it can catch the fact that the transform terminated and then continue on to the next test. Regards, Tony Graham Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML Guild member XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Philip Fearon | Thread | Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Philip Fearon |
Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Vladimir Nesterovsky | Date | Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Tony Graham |
Month |