Subject: Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2? From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:46:37 +0000 |
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Dave Pawson<davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Yes, that wast he hope!
The next problem to address is generating test results from each test, producing a cumulative test result and count... not something that XSLT is very good at with its lack of side effects!
^^^ test ^^^ ?Is anyone interested in agreeing on a convention for summarising XSLT output in an XML structured report? This report would include
xsl:message output, references to all xsl:result-document output, and details of all XSLT error messages for each test document. Reports should also be suitable for comparison with other reports and be extensible to include details such as zip-file origin and destination, when zip compressed XML is processed.
Yes Phil. I've a fair history in test. I'll take a look at the output (of the test run I guess?)
I've appended an abbreviated sample output report from CoherentWeb.
-- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Dave Pawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2? , Dave Pawson |
Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Liam R E Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] junit test... for xslt2?, Dave Pawson |
Month |