Subject: Re: [xsl] FO checkbox from 2 inline ZapfDingbat characters From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:23:38 +0000 |
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:26:03 +0200 Jacobus Reyneke <jacobusreyneke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I think what Karl means is that he wants to put one character on top > of the other, ie a check mark onto a square, rather than between two > characters. I don't know how this is done, but here are some > alternatives: Trust Unicode... or listen to Chris on the fop list. Try U+2611, BALLOT BOX WITH CHECK, or U+2612, BALLOT BOX WITH X. GIYF > An SVG image may be a good way to go if you really need fancy drop > shadow effects etc. I'm a novice with XSL-FO, but I have found SVG to > be a good alternative for floating objects in XSL-FO. > > Dave, is there any reason one should avoid SVG or is it o.k. to mix > and match it with XSL-FO? No, I can only see SVG usage increasing in xsl-fo in the future. It is so useful. HTH -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] FO checkbox from 2 inline, Jacobus Reyneke | Thread | Re: [xsl] FO checkbox from 2 inline, Kevin Brown |
Re: [xsl] Referencing content in XM, Jacobus Reyneke | Date | RE: [xsl] Difference between saxon , Michael Kay |
Month |