Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there stupid questions about documentation in xslt? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 06:32:35 -0700 |
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:07 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/05/2010 13:15, Alex Muir wrote: >> >> Q:: Would it be a good or bad idea to have a documentation doc or desc >> attribute allowed within the attributes of xsl elements something like >> this:? > > That is allowed in xslt already (even xslt 1). Any attributes from any > foreign namespace are allowed. the error message that you showed was not > saying that the namespaced attribute wasn't allowed at that point, it was > saying that the namespace wasn't declared. the XSLT stylesheet needs to be > namespace well formed with all prefixes declared. Even more fundamental: The* XML document* (which the XSLT stylesheet must be) must be wellformed, which , among other things, includes the requirement that every namespace prefix being used should be declared in such a scope that it is visible at the place of usage. > > David > > -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are there stupid question, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Are there stupid question, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] Are there stupid question, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there stupid question, G. Ken Holman |
Month |