Subject: Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:27:46 +0000 (GMT) |
Wolfgang Laun wrote: Hi, > Apparently, the sequence goes from leaf to root, which is the > closing tag order, as it should be. > Then, I iterate over the sequence, and now the nodes are > processed from root to leaf, which is strange. Within the same step (so including the predicate), a reverse axis is evaluated in reverse document order. But outside of the step it is used, it is in document order. This is the typical example of the difference between both following expressions: ancestor::*[2] (ancestor::*)[2] Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each, G. Ken Holman |
Month |