Subject: Re: [xsl] Converting from <dt><dd> pairs to better XML From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:13:51 +0100 |
This is based on the assumption that each dt is followed by exactly one dd. If there may be multiple dds after each dt, you should group adjacent dds in a first pass.I would normally tackle this using group-starting-with="dt", creating a group consisting of a dt and its following dd's.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Thread | Re: [xsl] Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
Re: [xsl] Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [xsl] Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
Month |