Subject: Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equivalent in xslt From: Michael Müller-Hillebrand <mmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:46:10 +0200 |
Sudheshna Iyer, In addition to Davids remark and based on my own experiences while learning XSLT I like to add this: If you want two separate results you simply process the input twice. In your description you use the word "during", and this concept is handled differently in a non-procedural language. The benefits of code IMO far outweigh the possible extra processing time. A real-world example: My source XML is a collection of articles by different authors. I process the content multiple times (all in one XSLT transform): a) to create HTML pages, b) to create a table of contents from the headings only, c) to create an alphabetical index from embedded index elements, d) to create an alphabetical author list from authors names. - Michael Am 29.09.2010 um 14:26 schrieb sudheshna iyer: > I have 10 fields for which I have to check the length and if length is > required length, I have to trucate those fields. > In that process, I have to maintain a field containing list of all fields that got truncated with original values to report back to > calling program. > > I used to have a StringBuffer in java during each condition to append all fields that got truncated with original values. I need the similar functionality.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equival, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equival, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Why is the variable and r, Alex Muir | Date | Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equival, Michael Kay |
Month |