Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:06:09 -0700 |
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Roger, > > I was just thinking that the current XSLT standard lacks interactivity, and > was about to suggest an element xsl:prompt for further revisions of the > standard. > This can be done easily using a single extension function. See my article from 2002: http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/articles/xslCalculator/The%20FXSL%20Calculator.html -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Thread | Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Are there things missing , cknell | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Michael Kay |
Month |