Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes

Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:20:57 +0000
On 08/11/2010 19:13, Andriy Gerasika wrote:


good practice.

why is -9 good practice rather that -188 or -123.456, or, as in the posted code, -0.5 ? what is so special about -9 that you say it _should_ be used?


>
> Saxon will say Recoverable Error if two template match the same node.

But there was no other templates of the same priority in the supplied code.

David

Current Thread