|
Subject: Re: Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i guess not From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:54:31 -0500 |
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 16:19 -0600, russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I used contains because filter could have the value
> filter="filter1,filter10,filter2" and i thought having a
> @filter='filter1' would fail for the previous string. If that is not
> the case, i'll change it, but i thought i tried that one time and it
> didn't work.
You want contains(concat(",", @filter, ","), ",filter1,") probably.
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this b, Chris Maloney |
| Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this b, Chris Maloney |
| Month |