Re: Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i guess not

[Chris Maloney <voldrani@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:19 PM,  <russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I used contains because filter could have the value
filter="filter1,filter10,filter2" and i thought having a @filter='filter1'
would fail for the previous string. If that is not the case, i'll change it,
but i thought i tried that one time and it didn't work.
>

No you are right, @filter="filter1" would fail.  That's one reason why
I suggested cleaning up the attribute value syntax, then you could use
something like

  contains(concat(normalize-space(@filter), " "), "filter1 ")

Note the space after 'filter1' -- that prevents it from matching
"filter11".  But this only works if you get rid of those commas.