Re: [xsl] Thank you

Subject: Re: [xsl] Thank you
From: Xmlizer <xmlizer+xsllist@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 19:54:50 +0200
Please ignore this email

Wrong reply to

Sorry for the noise

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Xmlizer <xmlizer+xsllist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Salut Anne,
>
> J'ai pensi ` toi, j'ai du passi 2/3 fois dans ta rue en vilib cette nuit
>
> J'esphre que ta soirie a iti bonne
>
> A jeudi
>
> Moz
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Mark <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I hope a simple thank you to the list for all the help I have received
>> over the past several months is not out of order. And a special thank you
>> for some specific advice from Ken G. Holman:   "You just had a perspective
>> that wasn't taking advantage of the inherent XML facilities in XSLT. XSLT
>> was designed *for* XML, not just a tack-on of a bunch of subroutines as is
>> true for non-XML languages."
>>
>> With that advice in mind, I have successfully refactored some very complex
>> and failure-prone XSLT into sets of simple and straightforward node
>> selection that perform exactly as I desired. Go figure?
>>
>> I learned style for the coding language I think in (C++) by repairing
faulty
>> code and from some excellent design pattern books. Since the only faulty
>> code I see now is my own, I'd like to know how to find some good sources
for
>> XSLT design patterns and style? (I do have the 4th edition of Michael's
fine
>> book.)
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Enjoy the weekend,
>> Mark

Current Thread