Subject: Re: [xsl] overriding xpath functions From: Jakub Malý <jakub@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:15:01 +0100 |
Thanks for the answers. The operator mapping table was what I was looking for (but in the wrong place, I expected to find it somewhere in the "functions and operators" recommendation). The thread linked by Andrew in fact addressed all of my additional questions. Jakub. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * is it written somewhere in the specs, that eq returns empty sequence >> when some of the operands is an empty sequence? I looked, but did not find >> it.. > > A lot of it is covered in this thread: > > http://markmail.org/thread/ekut6nktcluxsnbg#query:+page:1+mid:htioi45g53pswcv 2+state:results > > In summary it covers why: > > () eq () returns () > > () = () returns false > > deep-equal((), ()) returns true > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] overriding xpath function, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] soap:Header update, ram |
Re: [xsl] overriding xpath function, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl transormation from fl, Andreas Volz |
Month |