Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draft

[David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/07/2012 19:01, Michele R Combs wrote:

such a spoilsport:-) the correct response is "congratulations" or 
"interesting new features"! or something:-)

> Since relatively few folks adopted 2.0

How did you measure that? certainly almost all the traffic here has been 
xslt2 for years. (One of the shocks of looking at the xslt questions on 
stackoverflow where I look occasionally is that there is still there a 
tendency towards XSLT 1 use, which I found rather shocking really. 
Outside of a browser I'd not use xslt 1.

> what do we think the chances are of 3.0 being adopted?

Crystal balls required for that bit...

David