Subject: Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draft From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:28:12 -0700 |
Re: XSLT in the broeser: Have you heard of Saxon CE? -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it. On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Michele R Combs <mrrothen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Heh. You're quite right. Congratulations and yay for the new features, especially the accumulators and catch-ability :) > > I guess I was thinking of for example browsers being able to handle 2.0 features (which I don't think any can, can they?), but you're right of course, lots of people are using it internally. > > Michele > suitably chastened > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 2:14 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draft > > On 10/07/2012 19:01, Michele R Combs wrote: > > such a spoilsport:-) the correct response is "congratulations" or "interesting new features"! or something:-) > >> Since relatively few folks adopted 2.0 > > How did you measure that? certainly almost all the traffic here has been > xslt2 for years. (One of the shocks of looking at the xslt questions on stackoverflow where I look occasionally is that there is still there a tendency towards XSLT 1 use, which I found rather shocking really. > Outside of a browser I'd not use xslt 1. > > > what do we think the chances are of 3.0 being adopted? > > Crystal balls required for that bit... > > David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draf, Michele R Combs | Thread | Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draf, James Fuller |
Re: [xsl] Template match priority, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draf, James Fuller |
Month |