Subject: Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient? From: Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:08:04 +0200 |
However, such is not the case. I am dealing with an XML document that is 370 MB in size and has tens of thousands of references. And I have to repeat the embedding process multiple times.
Saxon gives me an "out of memory error."
I suspect the reason for this is due to the <xsl:copy> command. I believe it is making new copies, thereby consuming lots of memory. True?
So, is there an alternative to <xsl:copy> that is more efficient?
Is there a way to express the above template rule that is more efficient?
Martin Honnen --- MVP Data Platform Development http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of , Costello, Roger L. | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of , Costello, Roger L. | Date | Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Michael Kay |
Month |