Subject: Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:31:47 +0100 |
In most circumstances both will do exactly the same thing:In case the input document is parsed successfully, wouldn't the use of <xsl:sequence> (instead of <xsl:copy-of>) result in using less memory?
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. |
RE: [xsl] Replace content of elemen, trond.huso | Date | RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. |
Month |