Subject: Re: [xsl] position last and attributes From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:14:11 +0200 |
On 20/09/2012, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <A 1st="1" second="2" third="3" fourth="4" fifth="5"/> > > now tell me what are the first and last attributes of A. > It could be the first you wrote, or the first from left, or the first in the reverse collating sequence of their name. Who cares without an additional definition of which order to apply? Your question is just as meaningless as the question what is the first and last element in the *set* of all integers between 1 and 5. This does not make it impossible or meaningless to say "the first integer i remove from the set is 3". If you care about order, don't use sets. If you have sets, don't apply ordering concepts to their static abstract view. -W > Now if you tell me it's implementation defined then I'll say to you > that I can define an implementation of a drawing package that deems > the start point of a circle to be the coordinate at which it starts to > serialise the circle and since that could be any point whatsoever that > is totally meaningless.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka | Thread | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka |
Month |