Re: [xsl] position last and attributes

On 20/09/2012 07:13, Ihe Onwuka wrote:

It would seem (somewhat paradoxically) that given the definition of
position() and last() they could be applied to @* which is
intrinsically unordered.

Actually, there is a total ordering relation (document order) over all nodes. It's just that for two attributes of the same element (and indeed, say, for two elements in different documents) the ordering relation is implementation-dependent. So it's not correct to say that they are "intrinsically unordered". They are ordered, but not in a predictable way.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] position last and attributes, (continued) Michael Kay - 20 Sep 2012 13:55:27 -0000 Ihe Onwuka - 20 Sep 2012 13:58:06 -0000 Wolfgang Laun - 20 Sep 2012 12:14:20 -0000 Mukul Gandhi - 20 Sep 2012 12:30:43 -0000 Michael Kay - 20 Sep 2012 10:48:08 -0000 <= Ihe Onwuka - 20 Sep 2012 11:03:10 -0000 Message not available G. Ken Holman - 20 Sep 2012 12:45:33 -0000 Andrew Welch - 20 Sep 2012 12:56:32 -0000 Message not available G. Ken Holman - 20 Sep 2012 13:22:33 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] position last and attributes, (continued)
- Michael Kay - 20 Sep 2012 10:48:08 -0000 <=
  - Ihe Onwuka - 20 Sep 2012 11:03:10 -0000
    - Message not available
    - G. Ken Holman - 20 Sep 2012 12:45:33 -0000
    - Andrew Welch - 20 Sep 2012 12:56:32 -0000
    - Message not available
    - G. Ken Holman - 20 Sep 2012 13:22:33 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Mukul Gandhi	Thread	Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch	Date	Re: Fwd: [xsl] curly braces, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home