Subject: Re: [xsl] position last and attributes From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:45:40 +0100 |
>>> So what if A/@* is not a faithful representation. Should I present the >>> answers it gives me as a universal truth. >> >> No, it's the truth about the transformation process from one to the other. >> > > Agreed. So at essence this thread is about the nuance between > information derived from a representation and information derivable > from the real thing. You are making this waaay more complicated than it is. 1) A node list is created 2) calling position() on a node returns the position of that node in that list 3) calling last() on a node returns the position of the last node in that list (or in other words the size of the list) Thats all there is to it for those functions... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka | Thread | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka |
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch |
Month |