Subject: Re: [xsl] position last and attributes From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:56:24 +0100 |
> I saw a lot of comments talking about "[1]" and "[last()]" talking about > attributes, and I think that is the problem regarding the discussion: The > predicate "[1]" and "[last()]" is *not* based on the markup (attributes), > but rather is based on the order of nodes in the XPath data model (attribute > nodes). it's based on the dynamic context, which, changes eg: (@foo)[last()] (@foo, @bar)[last()] nothing special about attributes... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Ihe Onwuka |
Month |