Subject: Re: [xsl] position last and attributes From: "John P. McCaskey" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:01:26 -0400 |
At 2012-09-20 14:16 -0400, John P. McCaskey wrote:Yes. My mistake.I'd like the displayed order to be document order.I'm sure you mean to say "specified order" here, because I think we've established there is no document order for attributes.
. . . I see what you see in that a number of processors appear to put the attributes on the attribute axis in specified order, followed by the unspecified defaulted attributes in declaration order.So when there is no declaration, then -- even with all the haranguing about what the spec says -- an xsl:for-each or a select="@*[ ]" will take attributes in specified order.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] position last and attribu, G. Ken Holman |
Month |