Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alone programming language

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alone programming language
From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:48:54 +0100

> This actually asks whether or not stand-alone XPath 3.0 processors exist.

Why is the 'standalone' part important?  As long as there is an api to
run xpath 2.0 then any xslt 2.0 / xquery processor will do...

-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alone programming language, (continued) Liam R E Quin - 24 Oct 2012 18:57:33 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 24 Oct 2012 19:23:20 -0000 pgfearo - 24 Oct 2012 20:21:35 -0000 Mukul Gandhi - 26 Oct 2012 01:38:56 -0000 Andrew Welch - 24 Oct 2012 14:49:09 -0000 <= Liam R E Quin - 24 Oct 2012 15:00:35 -0000 Costello, Roger L. - 24 Oct 2012 14:51:07 -0000 Вячеслав Седов - 24 Oct 2012 14:54:17 -0000 Michael Kay - 24 Oct 2012 15:32:50 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alone programming language, (continued)
- Liam R E Quin - 24 Oct 2012 15:00:35 -0000
- Costello, Roger L. - 24 Oct 2012 14:51:07 -0000
  - Вячеслав Седов - 24 Oct 2012 14:54:17 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 24 Oct 2012 15:32:50 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alon, Mukul Gandhi	Thread	Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alon, Liam R E Quin
Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alon, Dimitre Novatchev	Date	[xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alone pr, Costello, Roger L.
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home