Subject: Re: [xsl] serialized form of XML using xslt 1.0 From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:03:07 +0000 |
>> I would have expected false false. But it's Friday afternoon. > > ....and the day after the christmas party :-( my head hurts. > > You are right - false false for Saxon, false true for Xalan. > > Any thoughts on a Xalan alternative approach? As you might expect, swapping around a few not()'s did the trick. It's fair to say that last thing I needed today was a Xalan specific namespace issue... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] serialized form of XML us, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] XML/XSL Revision Control/ Sou, AS |
Re: [xsl] serialized form of XML us, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Word Ladders as an exampl, Wolfgang Laun |
Month |