Subject: Re: [xsl] Entity references From: Michel Hendriksen <michel.hendriksen@xxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:57:06 +0100 |
Ok makes sense. What you are actually saying is that there is no way you can force this to be an error, unless having a processor that would be willing to do so? So an option could be to have something like a catalog that could supply a small DTD to validate against. Like containing a root element and allow any (mixed) content. Michel On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/01/2013 14:00, Michel Hendriksen wrote: >> >> When there is a reasoble DTD however, we >> don't get any error messages. Can anyone explain this? > > > > In a document without any DTD, a document with only an internal DTD subset > which contains no parameter entity references, or a document with " > standalone='yes' > > then an entity reference means that the document is not well formed and so > it is a "fatal error" from which an xml parser is not allowed to recover, > > if there is an external dtd subset that has not been read then a reference > is a validity error which means that a non validating parser id not obliged > to report it. > > > David > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England > and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: > Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is > powered by MessageLabs. > ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Entity references, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Entity references, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Entity references, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Entity references, Andrew Welch |
Month |