Subject: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors? From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:58:56 +0000 |
Hi Folks, I only know of one fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor -- SAXON. And it's not free. Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors? I believe that it is important there be at least one free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor. Here's why: The people I work with think along these lines: XSLT and XPath are nice but not essential. If I have to pay for an XSLT/XPath processor, then I certainly will not use XSLT or XPath. Why should I? I can use Java and it's free. You may not agree with their logic and it may be faulty, but that's the way many people think. So, if there is no free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor, I doubt that XSLT/XPath 3.0 will get any uptake by the people I work with. Comments? /Roger
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: [PATCH] math:random() mis, Nils Werner | Thread | Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Liam R E Quin |
[xsl] Re: [PATCH] math:random() mis, Nils Werner | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Liam R E Quin |
Month |