Subject: Re: [xsl] csv data to xml From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:27:43 +0200 |
On 26/06/2013, Graydon <graydon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you're going to do a lot of whatever it is, XSLT 2 is nearly ideal; > you get your escaping for free, you can deal with the > never-to-be-sufficiently accursed quoted commas by tokenizing on "?,"? > after tokenizing on the newlines, the unparsed-text functions are very > handy things, matches, replace, and xsl:analyze-string really can do > about everything you'd want. > > I realize it isn't a traditional way to think of XSLT, but, really, 2.0 > is very nearly as good as perl for pure string handling tasks. _And_ it > won't let you commit some sin of omission with your character encoding. > It would be a *very* interesting experiment to write this in XSLT 2.0 (you) and in Perl 5 (me), exchange, test and compare ;-) -W > -- Graydon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] csv data to xml, Graydon | Thread | Re: [xsl] csv data to xml, Graydon |
Re: [xsl] csv data to xml, Graydon | Date | Re: [xsl] csv data to xml, mlcook |
Month |