Subject: Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data to xml From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:41:58 +0200 |
On 30/06/2013, Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 09:49 +0200, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > >> XSLT is "special purpose" for XML handling and consequently easy to use, >> but it isn't better than the average language for string processing. > > "better" is subjective, or at least contextual. You shouldn't judge things from a point of individual experience, or with a certain problem in mind. I was trying to compare the elementary quality of the available functions and statements. > A strength of XML is > that you can do text processing even if you do not consider yourself to > be a "hard-core programmer". For many such people it's easier to work in > XSLT than in Perl or Python. *Serious* text processing isn't for amateurs, no matter which language. > > Which Perl module did you use to write XML? XML::Writer, which is purely accidental, since I didn't have to do this ever before. (This is not the place to discuss CPAN modules - I found one or two things I'd do otherwise.) Wolfgang > > Liam
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data t, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data t, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data t, Liam R E Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data t, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |