Subject: Re: [xsl] [Musing] User Preference for Functional Programming From: Hank Ratzesberger <xml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:11:57 -0700 |
Hi Liam, On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> wrote: >> /award/awardID/awardContractID/modNumber=FpdsInfo:modNum > > Your second, by the way, would be > greatly improved with spaces around the = sign. > Agreed. This is a line from a java Resource file. i think the space may be significant. In any case, developers use Eclipse, which as a resource file editor, so users can do this through a table view and editor. I suppose I should have showed everyone a screenshot of the editor. So, the task is actually to update a rather complex XML file, which we deliver to a third party repository. And yet programmers decided that xpath was more difficult to maintain than object notation. And I think this is a common complaint. But I have never heard anyone complain that they can't understand a Unix file path, e.g. Perhaps I should approach the JAXB group with your .get / .set idea. They are about 90% there already, only its necessary to pair an object with a document through a binder, but their object could provide a method that accepts a path option instead. https://jaxb.java.net/nonav/2.2.7/docs/api/javax/xml/bind/Binder.html Cheers, Hank -- Hank Ratzesberger XMLWerks.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [Musing] User Preference , Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] [Musing] User Preference , Ihe Onwuka |
Re: [xsl] [Musing] User Preference , Liam R E Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] [Musing] User Preference , Ihe Onwuka |
Month |