Subject: Re: [xsl] initial-page-number From: Graydon <graydon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:06:11 -0400 |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:34:33PM +0200, KAATMAN Matthew scripsit: > Thanks for the reply. I think what I need to do is abandon intial-page-number="1" so that I get normal 1-213 numbering. That fixes the acrobat issue. Last I had to look at this (2008!), this really was an Acrobat issue. Various other PDF viewers didn't have the problem. (This was with PDFs produced by Antenna House.) > Our group is converting documents from Framemaker to DITA and we had > the desired functionality in Frame. Hoping I can figure out a way to > do it in FO. (Is there a way to generate FO from Frame? Maybe > comparing the two would be revealing.) Note that Adobe owns Frame. You may want to look at what's doing your FO->PDF conversion; there may be variability in the ability of the various renderers to cope with whatever poorly documented peculiarity Acrobat's expecting in the page numbers. -- Graydon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] initial-page-number, KAATMAN Matthew | Thread | [xsl] Normalizing space / XPTY0004, Lief Erickson |
RE: [xsl] initial-page-number, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: [xsl] initial-page-number, KAATMAN Matthew |
Month |