Subject: Re: [xsl] best boolean practice From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:37:46 +0100 |
My personal preference is to use the presence or absence of an empty element e.g <isMasked/>. That way you don't have to worry about what to do if someone gives the node a value of "widget" when it is supposed to be boolean. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Terence Kearns <spasmoid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just a quickie. I'm writing some code to produce XML which will later > be transformed and selected on, and I am wondering what will be the > best way to represent boolean values as far as XSL designers are > concerned? > > value="yes" > value="true" > value="1" > > does it even make a difference at all? > > I'm thinking attributes will definitely be more intuitive than > elements. Am I right? > So this is not quite as good <value>yes</value> (certainly uses up > more characters). > > > > -- > http://TerenceKearns.com | ABN 58705023254 | ph 0412 235 575
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] best boolean practice, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] best boolean practice, Wolfgang Laun |
Re: [xsl] best boolean practice, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] best boolean practice, Wolfgang Laun |
Month |