Subject: Re: [xsl] best boolean practice From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 02:59:03 +0100 |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/07/2013, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> My personal preference is to use the presence or absence of an empty >> element e.g <isMasked/>. >> >> That way you don't have to worry about what to do if someone gives the >> node a value of "widget" when it is supposed to be boolean. > > However: an absent element could have been omitted by accident. I > dislike attributing a (potentially important) meaning to data that > isn't tangible. > The heart says flame war... the head says true dat. <value>false</value> = true The heart wins.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] best boolean practice, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | [xsl] Sorting nested steps, Rick Quatro |
Re: [xsl] Normalizing space / XPTY0, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | [xsl] Sorting nested steps, Rick Quatro |
Month |