Re: [xsl] Using Saxon 2.0 with FOP, XEP, Antenna House

[Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16 Oct 2013, at 12:08, Jesper Tverskov wrote:

> Hi Michael
>
> I'm not sure that I understand your answer.
>
> When I make my XSLT+FO transformation at the command line:
>
> MSXML+Antenna House = 1.3s
> Saxon 9n + Antenna House = 5s
> Saxon 9j + Antenna House = 2.5s
>
> The above figures are a little hard to understand considering that the
> XSLT step only takes a fraction of the FO step. Somehow AH must be
> optimized to use MSXML at the command line. I don't know if it is
> possible to overwin the "Java VM startup" problem as long as I have to
> use the command line interface of AH?
>

I'm afraid I know nothing about AntennaHouse or what facilities it provides
for invoking different XSLT processors. However, a startup cost of 2.5s for
starting up a Java VM doesn't surprise me in the slightest. I'm slightly more
surprised by the 5s for .NET, since I was under the impression .NET startup
costs were lower than Java.

Are you sure they are invoking MSXML via a command line interface? I would
think it's more likely they are invoking it directly via an API call, in which
case it will be much faster than any processor invoked using via a command
line exec.

Michael Kay
Saxonica