Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0? From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:58:52 +0000 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Toshihiko Makita <tmakita@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> >> >> The effort for maintaining and debugging for making publication does not >> become decreased by adopting of the CSS. Rather it will be increased by its >> architecture than XSL-FO especially in debugging. >> >> I heard that production level CSS stylesheet become over 3000 steps. If >> the final publication is not so complex, CSS can be a good solution. However >> maintaining and debugging the styles for publication by CSS is not so easy >> than XSL-FO. >> >> If my opinion has a misunderstanding, please indicate. >> >> >> --~--
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Tony Graham |
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] get attribute value in group , henry human |
Month |