Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 3.0 ? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:45:41 +0000 |
XSLT 3.0 has fallen behind the other specifications, largely because the work on streaming proved to be more challenging than expected. It's making progress though. Michael Kay Saxonica On 8 Nov 2013, at 09:12, Leo Studer <leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello > > it feels like I missed something in the discussion. What happens with the development of xslt 3.0. XPath and XQuery progressed to a proposed recommendation and xslt? > > Thanks in advance > Leo
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xslt 3.0 ?, Leo Studer | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Tony Graham |
[xsl] xslt 3.0 ?, Leo Studer | Date | [xsl] Re: xsl 2.0?, Charlie |
Month |