Re: [xsl] xslt 3.0 ?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 3.0 ?
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:45:41 +0000
XSLT 3.0 has fallen behind the other specifications, largely because the
work on streaming proved to be more challenging than expected. It's
making progress though.

Michael Kay

On 8 Nov 2013, at 09:12, Leo Studer <leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello
> it feels like I missed something in the discussion. What happens with the
development of xslt 3.0. XPath and XQuery progressed to a proposed
recommendation and xslt?
> Thanks in advance
> Leo

Current Thread