Re: [xsl] xsl:package/xsl:expose?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:package/xsl:expose?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:23:36 +0000
On 19/11/2013 12:09, Tony Graham wrote:
If I had a working implementation of xsl:package, the first thing I
would package is an existing 557-line module [2].  To have to jump
between the top and the bottom of the file when packagising it seems
like unnecessary work compared to allowing xsl:expose before the

although you need to add /xsl:package to the end anyway, it's not as if
you can just edit the top, admittedly it would be easier for an editor to inject that at the end without actually requiring you to look, but still..


Current Thread