Subject: Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with duplicates should be simple) From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:23:57 +0000 |
No thought then for the occasional user of the language who doesn't use it often enough such that he has barely acclimated to the basics much less the quirks. Y'know the sort of person that might want to do a transformation but doesn't use XSLT enough to think that if it is a primary vehicle for basic communication. I learnt it probably eradicated from my code and have freed up the brain cell for something more useful (yes I know I have a limited supply - thats why I don't want to waste them). On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You haven't answered my post in which I attempted to show that the XPath usage of "except" was consistent with the natural language use of the term. >> > > The first time I used it the except operator caught me out too, for at > least a few minutes. After I spent those few minutes learning how it > works, it made perfect sense from then on. > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Semantics of "match", Michael Kay |
Month |