Subject: Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with duplicates should be simple) From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:45:00 +0000 |
On 3 February 2014 15:23, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No thought then for the occasional user of the language who doesn't > use it often enough such that he has barely acclimated to the basics > much less the quirks. > > Y'know the sort of person that might want to do a transformation but > doesn't use XSLT enough to think that if it is a primary vehicle for > basic communication. > > I learnt it probably eradicated from my code and have freed up the > brain cell for something more useful (yes I know I have a limited > supply - thats why I don't want to waste them). The top tip when learning xslt is "dont guess, you will guess wrong". It's not because the spec is wrong, far from it, it's a work of genius - it's that the person guessing is wrong. As I often say, and its impossible to say this without sounding really patronising: everyone that properly understands xslt really likes it. Only those people that don't understand it have issues with it. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Ihe Onwuka | Thread | Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Semantics of "match", Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Michael Kay |
Month |