Subject: Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?|
From: David Rudel <fwqhgads@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:43:45 +0200
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Doesn't this make the result dependent on order of execution? > Aye. It does. -- "A false conclusion, once arrived at and widely accepted is not dislodged easily, and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously it is held." - Cantor's Law of Preservation of Ignorance.