<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?

Subject: Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?
From: David Rudel <fwqhgads@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:43:45 +0200
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Doesn't this make the result dependent on order of execution?
>

Aye. It does.


-- 

"A false conclusion, once arrived at and widely accepted is not
dislodged easily, and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously
it is held." - Cantor's Law of Preservation of Ignorance.
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, Michael Kay Thread [xsl] Issues with xs:error in the X, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, Michael Kay Date [xsl] Issues with xs:error in the X, Dimitre Novatchev
Month