Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:initial-template From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:20:03 -0000 |
On 1 May 2014, at 04:40, Max Toro <maxtoroq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If I understand correctly, in XSLT 3.0 you can initiate a > transformation at a named template, but you are not required to > provide a name because it uses "xsl:initial-template" as default. This > replaces the convention of using "main" or any other kind of > convention. Is this correct? Yes, that's correct. I think this was intended to simplify API design, but to be honest, I can't see it helping much, especially as we've added an awful lot of flexibility to the ways in which a stylesheet can now be invoked (e.g. by invoking functions directly). Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:initial-template, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:initial-template, Max Toro maxtoroq@xx |
Re: [xsl] xsl:initial-template, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:initial-template, Abel Braaksma (Exsel |
Month |