Subject: Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ? From: "Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:26:58 -0000 |
Dimitre, yes, this is nice, however can not be used in xsd:assertions. And there is a stack problem with large sequences. Thanks anyway Leo > On 25.03.2015, at 18:36, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> every $v in 1 to (count($sequence)-1) satisfies ($sequence[$v] lt $sequence[$v+1]) > > This may be inefficient (depending on the XPath engine being used). > > I think the following has better chances of being more efficient -- > write an xsl:function, name it, say, "increasing". The body of this > function can be just: > > not($seq[2]) or $seq[1] lt $seq[2] and increasing(subsequence($seq, 2)) > > > Cheers, > Dimitre > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> A similar problem as before, is the integer sequence increasing? >> >> this is my solution: >> >> every $v in 1 to (count($sequence)-1) satisfies ($sequence[$v] lt $sequence[$v+1]) >> >> Do you have a better one? >> >> Cheers >> Leo >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Dimitre Novatchev > --------------------------------------- > Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. > --------------------------------------- > To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk > ------------------------------------- > Never fight an inanimate object > ------------------------------------- > To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the > biggest mistake of all > ------------------------------------ > Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. > ------------------------------------- > You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what > you're doing is work or play > ------------------------------------- > To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. > ------------------------------------- > Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. > ------------------------------------- > Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they > write all patents, too? :) > ------------------------------------- > I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Leo Studer leo.stude | Thread | Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Date | Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Leo Studer leo.stude |
Month |