Subject: Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb within java context From: "Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 05:17:32 -0000 |
On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv@xxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any inputs in how the memory is handled in xpath vs jaxb ? For a xml of a > decent size (that a DOM can handle ) is there any preference of one or the > other in terms of performance ? > Than > > The question doesn't make sense. You cannot compare performance of programming languages or specifications. You might do this for *implementations,* and even then it typically varies, depending on the use case. And xpath and jaxb don't have the same use case domains. -W
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Vasu Chakkera vasucv | Thread | Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Vasu Chakkera vasucv |
Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Vasu Chakkera vasucv | Date | Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Alan Painter alan.pa |
Month |