Subject: Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb within java context From: "Vasu Chakkera vasucv@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:20:05 -0000 |
>>The question doesn't make sense. You cannot >>compare performance of programming >>languages or specifications. The question makes sense if you read the original question .. Which says when calling within java. On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv@xxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv@xxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any inputs in how the memory is handled in xpath vs jaxb ? For a xml of a > decent size (that a DOM can handle ) is there any preference of one or the > other in terms of performance ? > Than > > The question doesn't make sense. You cannot compare performance of programming languages or specifications. You might do this for *implementations,* and even then it typically varies, depending on the use case. And xpath and jaxb don't have the same use case domains. -W XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> EasyUnsubscribe <-list/620062> (by email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Wolfgang Laun wolfga | Thread | Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Alan Painter alan.pa |
Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Alan Painter alan.pa | Date | Re: [xsl] Xpath vs xslt vs jaxb wit, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |