Re: [xsl] Document processing order

Subject: Re: [xsl] Document processing order
From: "Joseph L. Casale jcasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:41:41 -0000
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xsl-list-
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 10:29 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] Document processing order

> Am I right in deducing that your concern is that once the first set of
> child elements has been removed, the information necessary to locate the
> second set will no longer be present?


> I don't think that is true for XSLT, as all the referenced location
> information is computed before processing starts, when all elements are
> still present.

In my case, the second template uses a traversal and it seems to fail
to locate the elements when I remove the related ones referenced in
the query.


Current Thread