Subject: Re: [xsl] Document processing order From: "Joseph L. Casale jcasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:41:41 -0000 |
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xsl-list- service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 10:29 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Document processing order > Am I right in deducing that your concern is that once the first set of > child elements has been removed, the information necessary to locate the > second set will no longer be present? Yup. > I don't think that is true for XSLT, as all the referenced location > information is computed before processing starts, when all elements are > still present. In my case, the second template uses a traversal and it seems to fail to locate the elements when I remove the related ones referenced in the query. thanks, jlc
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Peter Flynn peter@xx | Thread | [xsl] is there any XSL Splitter to , Rahul Singh rahulsin |
Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Joseph L. Casale jca |
Month |