Subject: Re: [xsl] Document processing order From: "Joseph L. Casale jcasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:34:31 -0000 |
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xsl-list- service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 10:41 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Document processing order > You're thinking of old-fashioned procedural programming languages that > modify data as they go along and where you have to worry about order of > execution. In XSLT, data is immutable, and operations happen conceptually in > parallel. You don't ever delete anything from the source document, you only > refrain from copying it to the result. Michael and Peter, Thank you very much for the confirmation, it was actually the second predicate of the query that was invalid and hence the first set of elements were removed and not the second. That was very insightful, jlc
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Michele R Combs mrro |
Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Joseph L. Casale jca | Date | Re: [xsl] Document processing order, Michele R Combs mrro |
Month |